Wednesday 29 August 2018

Review: Hotel Transylvania 3





Hotel Transylvania 3
Cert: U / 97 mins / Dir. Genndy Tartakovsky / Trailer



Yeah, I wasn't going to watch this, but I've sat through the first two and my #FilmDay had a gap to fill.

So, much in the same way as a TV sitcom whose writers landed a commission for a spin-off feature film then had no real idea how to continue their story on the big screen, Hotel Transylvania 3 takes its characters out of the eponymous location and off on holiday*1. This is effectively an animated reboot of Are You Being Served. Fewer 'pussy' jokes, though.

Speaking of which, the script here is outstandingly ordinary, a quality which is reflected in the voice-cast's delivery. Smiles and chuckles come from the slapstick and sight-gags, but even these are used too sparingly for a movie which desperately wants you to think that it's fun. And an Indiana Jones-esque action-sequence in the middle arrives thoroughly un-earned.

There's a dearth of ambition about the whole project, as if the filmmakers were aiming for the 97 minute runtime as a mark of success, rather than the telling of a good story. It's not so much that Hotel Transylvania 3 should be better (the preceding two films have proved that much), more that the writers are more interested spending time sharing uninteresting characters with little or nothing to actually say on any subtextual level. The father/daughter bonding and outsider-acceptance themes of the other entries have given way to Holiday On The Buses.

Considering that the Hotel Transylvania series is a 21st century animated comedy about monsters where imagination really is the only limit to what we see, there's a remarkable lack of imagination on display. Huge swathes of the movie feel like padding, and your visual storytelling technique has to be called into question when your screenplay features characters throughout the film just describing exactly what's happening on-screen, like a build in audio-description track.

The U-certificate means the execution of this has about as much edge as a marshmallow of course, but that's always been the way for these, and was unlikely to change at this late stage. But Sony's animation team have come on in leaps and bounds with the movement and texturing looking better than ever, although the character design for non-monster characters feels uninspired (plus, their propensity for retail-product placement is as mortifying as ever).

Much like Marvel's Inhumans, the most relatable character in this troubled production is a giant CGI dog who doesn't really have any dialogue.



So, what sort of thing is it similar to?
The first two films in the series.


Is it worth paying cinema-prices to see?
No.


Is it worth hunting out on DVD, Blu-ray or streaming, though?
No.


Is this the best work of the cast or director?
No.


Will we disagree about this film in a pub?
No, you'll agree with me.


Is there a Wilhelm Scream in it?
No.


Yeah but what's the Star Wars connection?
Level 1: The guy behind the outstanding Star Wars: Clone Wars micro-series is, inexplicably, the director co-writer of this.


And if I HAD to put a number on it…


*1 Okay wait, have we really had three Hotel Transylvania films now where a "welcome to the Hotel California" pun hasn't been made? This tells you everything you need to know about the series' approach to comedy writing, of course. Not that it has the stoic restraint to avoid a glaringly obvious pun which seems like the sole reason the title was chosen, but more that the writing team didn't know it was there in the first place. [ BACK ]

DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

No comments:

Post a Comment