Review: Scream V (second-pass)

Scream V
Cert: 18 / 114 mins / Dir. Matt Bettinelli-Olpin & Tyler Gillett / Trailer

And so, the double-bill to unveil the sixth entry in the Scream series involved a re-screening of the 2022's soft-relaunch*¹. That this Wednesday-night fanfare attracted a little over a dozen viewers*² might say something about the property's popularity, but that fact that its necessity would not be unveiled until the second half says far more about the creative direction as a whole.

Over-scripted, over-soundtracked and over-directed with deliberately intrusive sound design, there is, unfortunately, not much more to expand upon after watching this the first time. The film's high-points are every bit as triumphant, whereas the explaining-how-sequels-work schtick feels even more like shameless padding. While there's little to actively dislike in a movie crowded with two screenwriters and two directors, 2022's outing could only be more self-absorbed if it had a fictional director's commentary playing over the top.

That said, if all of the coy introspection was removed, the film would be around half an hour long. Quite frankly it's a miracle that the finale is as gloriously satisfying as it is*³, although that seems as much of a tribute to Once Upon A Time In Hollywood as 1996's Scream. If Scary Movie hadn't already been run mercilessly into the ground, you'd swear blind this was a parody of itself.

Ironically, 2022's Scream is far better at being the simplistic slasher it thinks it's better than, than being the intellectual thing it wants to be and that everyone's expecting anyway. The pen may be mightier than the sword, but ultimately the kitchen-knife is a far more brutal critic than the Media Studies nerd. A lesson for us all, there...

*¹ So back in 2022 Paramount 'rebooted' the line (according to the film's own script) and called this simply "Scream". Fine, except that a) it's not a reboot it's definitely a sequel, and b) the subsequent lack of distinction between the first and fifth entries is uninspired and unhelpful. Fast forward to 2023 and this film's sequel is then called "Scream VI" which, by very definition, turns 2022's Scream back into Scream V by default, hence the title of this review post. Although fuck knows where the roman numerals have appeared from for number 6, because Screams 1-4 weren't that pretentious. But number five definitely is, hence the title of this review post. I mean, if they can work "VI" into the M of Scream for the sixth movie's logo design, it stands to reason that just putting V in there for the one before is a piece of piss. But apparently not. All in all, needlessly messy, Paramount. Do you see what you made me do? ^{[ BACK ]}

*² Yeah, this all happened at the beginning of March; yeah this review is landing at the end of March. To paraphrase Dr Ian Malcolm, "life finds a way... of fucking everything up for itself and leaving little time - never mind concentration - for frivolities such as writing about what films you've been watching". Still, back now... ^{[ BACK ]}

*³ Yeah look, as much as I've got Opinions™ about Scream V, I defy anyone not to enjoy the last fifteen minutes, even if that carnage is just a cathartic release from all of the cinematic onanism which has led up to it. ^{[ BACK ]}

DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

Review: Scream (2022)

Scream (2022)
Cert: 18 / 114 mins / Dir. Matt Bettinelli-Olpin & Tyler Gillett / Trailer

It is, it has to be said, not a particularly great time for fans of the picture-house. Not withstanding (understandable) audience reticence and the tug-of-war between theatrical distribution and streaming services, a glance at the scheduling for this weekend reveals Boss Baby 2, The 355, The King's Man, The Matrix Resurrections, Spider-Man: No Way Home, Clifford The Big Red Dog and West Side Story. Or, to put it another way: sequel, straight-to-video genre bilge, prequel, sequel, sequel, cinematic reboot and remake. And as satisfying as some of these are, it's hard to get excited when the message from the industry seems to be 'follow the easy money; give them what they think they want, not what cinema needs'.

Oh yeah, and another Scream movie opens as well...

Old scores become ripe for settling as a figure in a notorious mask begins a new killing spree in Woodsboro, sparking fears that a decade-long cycle is just about to tick over. And as this implies, the film is very much aware of the gap between its fourth and fifth installments*¹, determined to work it into the mythology as a feature rather than a bug. And it's this knowing raise of an eyebrow which sees the new entry teetering between self-referential homage and shameless retread throughout.

COMFORT

So as you can tell by this point, Tyler Gillett and Matt Bettinelli-Olpin's debut into this sporadic franchise is potentially problematic for viewers who are seeking entertainment which refreshes with something new and inventive, rather than comforts with familiarity (or as close to 'comfort' as a slasher flick can get, anyhow). But of course, how much bristling originality can a viewer really want or expect five movies into a series?

Older (Legacy™) characters return to the fray having moved on just enough to make their inclusion feel natural, while the new young protagonists drive the story through familiar streets (literally). James Vanderbilt and Guy Busick's script pushes the same buttons as its cinematic predecessors and, it's thankful to note, largely gets results thanks to the commitment of its cast. Sure, everyone's having fun, but they're taking that fun seriously. In addition to the in-universe meta references, there are of course a plethora of more subtle (ie not literally described) homages and winks to fans of the genre at large. And bonus points have to be awarded for what is probably the finest unofficial callback to Once Upon A Time In Hollywood that we'll ever see.

LENOR

But the main hurdle that the film struggles to clear is that Slasher Film Deconstruction™ has been going on for so long now (and started, specifically, by Scream) that a generation of cinemagoers have grown up with it as their default watching-mode. It's 2022 so naturally this film seems to spend longer explaining what it's going to do than actually just doing it. One almost imagines it snagged that 18 certificate for Extended Scenes Of Structural Exposition*²...

So given that dialogued references to 4Chan and the state of Re-quel™ cinema aren't quite cutting it as unique insight, what can a new chapter really bring to the table in 2022? The snark and faux-lecturing about toxic fandom and worn-out franchising is all well and good, but don't come across as particularly clever if the smart-ass characters are just verbalising what the audience is thinking at that moment anyway. But hey, as much as Scream is clearly in love with its own aura, the film at least doesn't take itself as seriously as the likes of Halloween.

And as the minutes tick along to an almost frustratingly ouroboric ending, the suspicion grows that ultimately this is just More Of The Same. Although to be fair, when The Same is done as solidly as this, things could certainly be far worse.

And yet for all the chin-stroking cynicism from me and indeed the screenplay itself, the film finally reaches its bloody crescendo of righteous retaliation and everything clicks into place. The real trick was distraction. And it worked. Because as adrenaline surges and the audience feels itself inwardly cheering along with every climactic blow, slash, stab and gunshot, they realise they've been hooked. And it's revealed that Scream has in fact worked perfectly in fulfilling its only true remit: being - against all odds - a pretty fucking great Scream movie.

The problems exist but they aren't a bug, they're a feature.

*¹ Oh what, so you're happy to market "SCRE4M" but you draw the line at 5CREAM? Fucking cowards...
(I jest obviously, to be fair there wasn't a SCR3AM in this series, either) ^{[ BACK ]}

*² I know I'm labouring the point, but so does the film. It really feels like Scream makes a good companion-piece with The Matrix Resurrections, just for blatantly repeating things while telling the audience that's clever rather than lazy.^{[ BACK ]}

DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.