Showing posts with label Angus Sampson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Angus Sampson. Show all posts

Friday, 7 July 2023

Review: Insidious - The Red Door


Insidious: The Red Door
Cert: 15 / 107 mins / Dir. Patrick Wilson / Trailer

It has been, lest we forget, five years since the last Insidious movie. And ten years since the last good one. But Sony and Blumhouse have decided there are still fumes in the tank and this time co-leading man Patrick Wilson makes his directorial debut as well. Writer Leigh Whannell returns once more (this time in the company of Scott Teems), and we're back with the core cast where it all began.

In this fifth installment (there may be no numbers in the titles but rest assured Sony, we're counting), it's nine years after the events of Insidious Chapter 2 and the Lambert family's precarious happy ever after has petered to an end. Josh (Patrick Wilson) and Renai (Rose Byrne) have separated, Josh's mother Lorraine has passed away*1, and the spectral lodestone himself Dalton (Ty Simpkins) is about to go to art college. Josh is struggling with brainfog, as the lasting effects of the post-hypnotic suggestion that prevent him astrally projecting himself into danger are conflicting with his long-term memory. Similarly, Dalton finds that magically forgetting his abilities doesn't stop creatures from the other side seeking him out anyway...


EARNEST


After a slow-burn of a first act which plays like a genuinely interesting family melodrama, the colour saturation and gamma correction are turned down so the push-button, cattle-prod jump-scares can begin in earnest. You get the impression it's not that Patrick Wilson has anything new or unique to bring to this as a director, more that the man has starred in enough mid-budget studio horror movies that he's looked at whoever's sitting in The Big Chair and thought 'yeah, I reckon I could do that'. Insidious: The Red Door is by no means a bad movie, but it utterly squanders the property's cumulative potential.

Ty Simpkins' performance is strong in and of itself, but the role doesn't really allow him to flex as an actor (although has it ever?). Patrick Wilson, on the other hand, feels underratedly solid once again, with a surprisingly delicate turn that's no doubt the advantage of being able to direct one's own scenes. Both Wilson and Byrne have always had a decent handle in these films of conveying the actual weight of their emotion rather than just Shrieking-Fear, and this outing is no different. Sure, as a metaphor for parental anxiety and empty nest syndrome it's a bit on the nose, but the subtext is better for being text rather than being absent completely.


GREGORY


Of course Dalton's college setting opens the door to an array of setpieces the series has been previously unable to exploit: Shitty Teen Horror™. And leading the charge here, Sinclair Daniel as Dalton's roommate Chris seems to be acting in a far tackier version of the movie*2 despite bringing a welcome 'civilian' viewpoint. The keg-stands and explosive vomit occupy a limited section of the film thankfully, but their presence in the first place cheapens it.

Speaking of presence, in-universe character deaths don't stop other familiar faces returning of course, some of whom fill supporting roles while many are relegated to cameo-status. Between the demons we've already met and footage from the first two chapters intercut and re-composited throughout, there's plenty of connective tissue here. But crucially, there's never the feeling of two-way narrative traffic that writer Leigh Whannell once achieved. The film seems to spend a lot of its time pointing out the series' former glories, rather than expanding or exploring them.


PENNY


If Insidious really had more to add to the story, it would have done so with its third movie. This tonal collection of callbacks has all the physical properties of a competent shocker, but doesn't enhance the events of those early films and barely even adds to them in any meaningful way. The style is fine, but ultimately this is hampered by a lack of coherent writing. The film seems to end just because things stop happening, rather than plot-points having been usefully resolved. This could be seen through some eyes as sequel-bait, but as of the closing credits there really is no story to continue.


The long and short of all this is that The Red Door is more interesting than the last two Insidious movies, and nowhere near as inventive as the first two. Which, at this point, feels about right...



And if I HAD to put a number on it…




*1 Yes that's right they've written out Barbara Hershey, the only claim to any semblance of dignity these movies ever had.
[ BACK ]
*2 According to this script, there are actual human teenagers in the present day who literally say "BRB" and "interwebs" out loud using their mouths and sweet Christ will somebody please make it stop if I wanted this shit I'd watch Bodies Bodies Bodies.
[ BACK ]

DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

Thursday, 11 June 2015

Review: Insidious Chapter 3

World of Blackout Film Review

Insidious Chapter 3 Poster

Insidious Chapter 3
Cert: 15 / 98 mins / Dir. Leigh Whannell / Trailer
WoB Rating: 4/7


And once again, a combination of the poorly-written screenplay that is my life, and a dearth of movies I haven't already seen at the cinema conspire to make World Of Blackout a pretty quiet place for the start of June. I'm sure you've all been out enjoying the weather, anyway. Truth be told, I could probably have wrangled out a couple of space-fillers, but I'd rather not waste my time and yours with content which appears to be relevant, yet is actually a clear case of cashing in on an existing wave of goodwill and momentum. Oh, speaking of which…

Yay! Insidious Chapter 3, the film that we didn't really need at all! The one without the central family that the first two films were written around! The one starring Lin Shaye, again, who got so impatient waiting to reprise her secondary-role as Creepy Old Lady that she went ahead and did it in Ouija to kill a bit of time between Insidii! Yay.

Yes, gone are Patrick Wilson, Rose Byrne and Ty Simpkins' Lambert Family, the supernatural-lodestones that drove the story up to this point, as this movie is a prequel. A prequel which could, in all honesty, be pretty much any other horror made in the last ten years were it not for the heavy-handed introduction of the supporting-cast of Insidious. An incredibly bog-standard haunted-house tale with sporadic appearances from Shaye's mystic ghostbuster, Elise ambles along amiably, if blandly for the first half.

As well as the reluctant medium, we get the beginning of her partnership with spook investigators Specs and Tucker, her moral support from Carl, the beginning of her ruck with The Bride In Black and even a brief appearance from Darth Maul In A Leotard. In fact, the second half of the film spends so much time shoehorning in characters from its earlier brethren that it forgets about the story it's supposed to be telling this time round. Characters who would usually be earmarked for third-act importance in any other flick of this type (Ashton Moio's prospective boy-next-door love interest, Phyllis Applegate's creepy/otherworldly elderly black woman stereotype) are completely abandoned by the script as Lin Shaye takes centre-stage and makes it All About Her Personally Now. Even the obligatory second-act plot-unravelling is glossed over as it's decided we don't really need to know anything about the central antagonist after all, because hey look, here's the spooky lady from the first film!*1

The sad fact (okay, opinion) is that Leigh Whannell's writing itself was what made Insidious and Insidious Chapter 2 so enjoyable. A bold-as-brass plot device to get as many types of ghost into the frame as possible, coupled with a self-aware, tongue-in-cheek script lifted the films above the standard manky old spectre chasing after a teenage girl in hotpants schtick. The sequel also enhanced the original as well as following it up, adding (and twisting) depth, and even filling in some of the gaps cheekily left by the original. Insidious Chapter 3 does none of this, unfortunately. It is to the plot of Insidious what Freddie's Nightmares were to A Nightmare On Elm Street. Utter, utter filler.

As contemporary horror films go, Insidious Chapter 3 is competently assembled, and it's certainly way ahead of certain other entries to the genre I could name. The jumps are there and so is the creepiness. But there's no spark this time around; it's a thinly veiled spin-off masquerading as a chapter…



Is this film worth paying £10+ to see?
In all honesty, it's not.


Well, I don't like the cinema. Buy it, rent it, or wait for it to be on telly?
Oh, it's a DVD with the lights off. In all honesty, it'll probably work better as a triple-bill with its predecessors.


Does this film represent the best work of the leading performer(s)?
Well, this seems to be all that Lin Shaye really does, so who knows?


Does the film achieve what it sets out to do?
It achieves far, far less than the first two films.


Will I think less of you if we disagree about how good/bad this film is?
A little, yeah.


Oh, and is there a Wilhelm Scream in it?
There ain't.


…but what's the Star Wars connection?
Insidious Chapter 3 stars Stefanie Scott, who appeared in 2011's No Strings Attached as the young-iteration of Natalie 'Padmé' Portman's character, Emma.


And if I HAD to put a number on it…




*1 Or man from the second film, even.

DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.