Showing posts with label Nicolas Cage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nicolas Cage. Show all posts

Sunday, 30 April 2023

Review: Renfield


Renfield
Cert: 15 / 93 mins / Dir. Chris McKay / Trailer

To New Orleans then, a classically luscious setting with a nuanced past that is in no way properly utilised in Chris McKay's Renfield. A post-modern spin on the Dracula-mythos, our eponymous hero (Nicholas Hoult) is the embattled familiar/day-servant of the archetypal vampire (Nicolas Cage). Despite the dark lord's magnetic lure however, Renfield grows frustrated and despondent. Chancing into a group therapy session one evening, he begins to realise that there's more to (un)life if he can just make the right choices. The group have much to learn from each other. Additionally, chancing into a busy bar one evening, Renfield comes across the crime family running the city's underworld (Shohreh Aghdashloo, Ben Schwartz), and Rebecca (Awkwafina), the put-upon police officer who seems to be the only force for actual good this side of the Mississippi. The pair have much to learn from each other.

That's right, there are essentially two films going on, here. Both have a connection through the deconstruction of toxic relationships and both manage this with a pleasing amount of smirk-inducing (and in places guffawing) comedy, but The Vampire Sitcom and The Crime Caper never quite meet in the middle to make a cohesive whole. And rest assured, Renfield is not a horror flick; it's first and foremost an action comedy which happens to have horror-characters in it.

The main draw for a civilian audience is Nic Cage as Dracula of course, and our man puts in a very respectable and restrained performance as a six hundred year old narcissist. While the audience get value for money from Cage's smouldering and snarling, it's the needy, passive-aggressive side of the character where he's having the most fun, and this is where the majority of the film's snide humour lies. That said, in terms of emotional performance and understated comic timing, the headliner is thoroughly outshone by Hoult and Awkwafina, effortlessly dead-panning their way through a Ryan Ridley's script and emerging as far more likeable characters than the film probably deserves. The action scenes are well executed and - in places - gloriously over the top, but again they feel as if they've been lifted from a more high-octane thriller.

Almost every other version of this would exist to take potshots at therapy-culture and the fragmented priorities of modern life. Renfield tackles its subtext (or more properly just 'text') with a remarkably straight face, and is all the more heartfelt for it. The bad guys are The Bad Guys, not the people struggling to cope or those trying to help them. While the film certainly nods to the ridiculousness of their situations, they themselves aren't ridiculed. That sincerity itself feels slightly out of place in a studio comedy and adds to the air of a movie which can't quite find its place to ensure longevity. Even the screenplay itself realises in its final moments that huge elements of the story make little-to-no sense, and instead just comforts the audience with the knowledge that they've had a good time if nothing else.


With plenty of fantastic elements from a wide array of sources, Renfield never quite achieves the greatness of its potential. It is, at its beating heart, a Saturday night movie to be enjoyed with noisy friends and messy drinks. This in itself is pretty damned satisfying, so maybe that's the real lesson here...


And if I HAD to put a number on it…





DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

Tuesday, 27 November 2018

Review: Mandy





Mandy
Cert: 18 / 121 mins / Dir. Panos Cosmatos / Trailer



It does seem that every new Nic Cage film arrives accompanied by the descriptor 'going full Nic Cage' as its selling point. Obviously the guy can't be trapped in an ever-escalating gyroscope of cinema, but it does sometimes feel like movies are being written with him specifically in mind.

This offering from director and co-writer Panos Cosmatos sees Cage star as Red, a logger residing in the Californian mountains with his artist girlfriend Mandy (Andrea Riseborough) in 1983. When the members of a cult pass through the backwater, their leader Jeremiah (Linus Roache) becomes obsessed with Mandy and orders his followers to kidnap her to join the group. Mandy is resistant to both the ideology and the psychotropic drugs forced upon her, and in a fit of pique Jeremiah orders her to be killed while Red watches. Left for dead, our protagonist frees himself and embarks on a rampaging odyssey of brutal revenge, where the boundaries of reality become as warped as the morality of his nemeses…

CAGE


And it's glorious. Two hours of extravagantly outlandish, glorious carnage paying homage to space rock and pulp fantasy novels. Because obviously in a movie where cultists play an ocarina to summon a gang of knock-off Cenobites on quad bikes without batting an eyelid, Nic Cage is going to wear a Ray-Ban Aviators as safety goggles while he forges himself a battle-axe, before later eschewing that weapon to have a chainsaw fight. Everything about this screams fuck yeah.

Mandy is the sort of movie where the viewer never loses track of what's going on, but if it was paused and they were asked to give a summary probably wouldn't know where to start. It's a ponderous, vigorous, hallucinatory companion piece to Drive Angry with notes of Rocky Horror and The Hills Have Eyes. It would be self-indulgent if it wasn't so gleefully volatile.

GOFFE


As much as the film effects an air of schlocky trash, Mandy can't disguise the precision and joy with which it's been made. As if Robert Rodriguez, Eli Roth and Darren Aronofsky raised a child in some twisted parody of Three Men And A Baby and then unleashed it upon the world. And that's not to say this is an exploitative, mindless gorefest - it's not. But it clearly loves the films which are and has channeled that fondness through the prism of Nic Cage's desensitised fury.

The film is split into acts, each presented with their own uniquely styled (yet visually continuous) title card. Cinematographer Benjamin Loeb treats the story like his own fever dream, with neither a prop nor pixel out of place in each meticulously constructed shot. Whether it's the blood-hued interior of a stark, angular wooden church, an alien cosmos resting over the forest skyline or just Nic Cage screaming on the toilet in his pants as he necks vodka from the bottle, you'll be hard pushed to find more arresting imagery this year in such an accessible format*1.

SHERIFF'S BADGE


Mandy is precisely the sort of thing I enjoy travelling into London to watch, and it quickly became apparent why this didn't play at my local cinema (not that I'd expected it to). At this late stage, the cage fight*2 for the Film Of The Year award just got a bit more crowded.

Plus y'know, Cheddar Goblin!

We do not deserve Nic Cage.
We do not deserve Andrea Riseborough.
And we most certainly do not deserve Panos Cosmatos.
Bravo.



So, what sort of thing is it similar to?
Well let's start with Drive Angry, but there's far more to it than that.


Is it worth paying cinema-prices to see?
If you can, absolutely.


Is it worth hunting out on DVD, Blu-ray or streaming, though?
It is.


Is this the best work of the cast or director?
It could just well be.


Will we disagree about this film in a pub?
It's possible, I suppose.


Is there a Wilhelm Scream in it?
Not that I heard.


Yeah but what's the Star Wars connection?
Level 1: That prisoner from off of Rogue One is in this.


And if I HAD to put a number on it…


*1 I'm looking at you, Suspiria. [ BACK ]

*2 No pun intended, I promise. [ BACK ]


DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

Wednesday, 22 August 2018

Review: Teen Titans Go! To The Movies





Teen Titans Go! To The Movies
Cert: PG / 88 mins / Dir. Peter Rida Michail & Aaron Horvath / Trailer



I started grinning a few seconds into The Late Batsby short, which precedes Peter Michail and Aaron Horvath's cinematic rendering of the Cartoon Network show, Teen Titans Go!. I was still smiling as the final recurring gag occurred at the end of the credits, and continued to do so for a good while after*1...

Teen Titans Go! To The Movies is the big-screen offshoot of the aforementioned cartoon set in a comic-version of the DC universe, in which - sick of being known only as Batman’s sidekick - young Robin is determined to go to Hollywood and be the star of his own superhero movie. While the ‘big boys’ are off fighting crime, Cyborg, Beast Boy, Raven and Starfire tag along for the ride, hopefully saving the world from the evil Slade in the process.

I think it's safe to say that DC have finally cracked the secret to transferring group-versions of their heroes to the big screen, and the main ingredient in this recipe is humour.

Every single frame of TTG!TTM is a hyper-kinetic joy, blending the visuals of Batman: The Animated Series with those of The Powerpuff Girls, and twisting the story structure of Jay And Silent Bob Strike Back filtered through the deconstructive smart-assery of Deadpool. All the while being entirely suitable for your padawans.

From its fixation with cassettes and VHS tapes to finally bringing us a Nic Cage Superman, the self-awareness of both the genre and the format leaps out of the screen. As a Marvel-kid, I think I 'got' around half of the plentiful in-jokes and Easter-eggs on offer, but even the other half are so glibly presented that it's just fun knowing that people will get more out of the film than me.

At just 88 minutes from end-to-end, this is short and punchy, not unlike its heroes. As well as the Batgirl adventure at the top, that runtime also squeezes in a five minute time-travel segment, and a toilet joke that lasts for around three minutes. Fantastic stuff. Using the relentless pacing of a 22 minute TV cartoon, things begin to sag a little at the hour-mark when the focus moves from the jokes to the actual plot. But this soon picks up again when the directors realise the movie can easily juggle both.

Far, far funnier than any live-action studio comedy in recent memory, TTG!TTM is another reminder that dark and moody DC is at its most accessible (ie profitable) when it's neon-lit and unrepentantly silly.

I wish Star Wars: Forces Of Destiny was as much fun as this.


And it's coming to something when the Stan Lee cameo in a DC movie is arguably better than his appearance in the last Marvel flick...


So, what sort of thing is it similar to?
Lego Batman, Captain Underpants, The Super Hero Squad Show.


Is it worth paying cinema-prices to see?
Given that it's firmly small-screen in its scope, yes.


Is it worth hunting out on DVD, Blu-ray or streaming, though?
If you're a fan of the genre, this will be one to have on the shelf.


Is this the best work of the cast or director?
I'm not familiar with the work of most performers involved here, but it's a strong play, yes.


Will we disagree about this film in a pub?
That's possible.


Is there a Wilhelm Scream in it?
Not that I heard.


Yeah but what's the Star Wars connection?
Level 1: The voices of Rebels' Hera (and Dark Forces' Jan), Lego Luke Skywalker, Clone Wars Obi-Wan Kenobi and Clone Wars Nute Gunray are in this.


And if I HAD to put a number on it…


*1 My next scheduled film of the day was Hotel Transylvania 3, so obviously the smile didn’t last for too much longer. But hey, you take what you can get, right? [ BACK ]

DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

Thursday, 15 March 2018

Review: Mom And Dad





Mom And Dad
Cert: 15 / 86 mins / Dir. Brian Taylor / Trailer



Because sometimes, as pleasantly surprising, heartwarming and theatrically introspective as a day's cinema-viewing can be, you just want a nice jet-black comedy featuring someone being attacked with a meat-tenderiser on the front lawn…

Mid-life crises, social media, gun-control, school lockdown procedures and good old suburban angst are all fair game for hyper-reality analysis in Mom & Dad, a post-millennial horror/satire about parents unexplainedly*1 attacking and killing their own children. It's also bloody good fun. From the faux-70s title sequence, the audience knows it's in for a movie which has plenty to say without taking itself too seriously. And while this sounds like an awkward balance, that's not the one which causes the biggest problems.

Nicolas Cage and Selma Blair star as Brent and Kendall Ryan, the eponymous couple, parents of two school-age children, Carly (Anne Winters) and Josh (Zackary Arthur), who spend the day watching news reports of the apparently motiveless mass-attacks with increasing concern until they themselves are driven by the same inexplicable urge. It's at this point that the film switches between the adults and the kids as their home becomes a bloodstained battleground. There have been plenty of horror movies about teenage paranoia over the years of course, but writer/director Brian Taylor's feature is one which tells its tale (at least partly) from the parents' point of view; they don't turn into mindless zombies and have no inclination to kill other people's children - just their own.

Unfortunately, while the in-universe rules of this intriguing setup are established loosely, the film soon becomes so pre-occupied with the mechanics of a reverse home-invasion that they're all but forgotten about. Setpieces accelerate nicely, promising huge pay-offs but then pull back to another buildup elsewhere, and a plot device with subconsciously-detectable TV signals is hinted at*2, before being discarded altogether. 

Of course, since almost everyone on-screen goes nuts before Nic Cage, their escalating behaviour just sets the bar for him - a bar he smashes through as only he can, with unhinged ease. Like a honey badger that's been sleep-deprived, force-fed Sunny D and mescaline then let loose in a moshpit. But even this comes in fits and starts, as explanatory dialogue and flashbacks continue to play a part well into the third act. When the ending abruptly arrives, so little is wrapped up that it feels like the budget and schedule ran out simultaneously (even moreso than in Red State), and Taylor has spend 75 minutes writing cheques he's realised he can't cash*3.

The limits of 15-certification, a short run-time and erratic pacing hold Mom & Dad back from realising its full, glorious batshit potential. Although it's still enormous fun in the meanwhile.

Plus, someone gets attacked with a meat-tenderiser on the front lawn, so...



So, what sort of thing is it similar to?
Think of The Happening, mixed with The Belko Experiment.


Is it worth paying cinema-prices to see?
I suspect you'll definitely get the most out of this on a big screen.


Is it worth hunting out on DVD, Blu-ray or streaming, though?
A buy-er, once it comes down to a reasonable price.


Is this the best work of the cast or director?
Not particularly.


Will we disagree about this film in a pub?
Not at all.


Is there a Wilhelm Scream in it?
Not a one.


Yeah but what's the Star Wars connection?
Level 2: This film's got that Selma Blair in it, and she was in 1999's Cruel Intentions along with Sarah Michelle 'Seventh Sister' Gellar.


And if I HAD to put a number on it…


*1 By which I mean it's left unexplained, but more on that later. [ BACK ]

*2And this only stands out because modern televisions don't generally display white-noise. [ BACK ]

*3 And for the record, that fire would have fed back into the gas-supply and taken out the entire house. Obviously. [ BACK ]


DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

Thursday, 24 September 2015

Review: Raising Arizona

I can't believe I haven't seen…

Raising Arizona Poster

Raising Arizona (1987)
Cert: 12 / 94 mins / Dir. Joel Coen & Ethan Coen / Trailer
WoB Rating: 5/7


Somehow, it turns out I've been enjoying My Name Is Earl all these years without having seen this. The amount of influence that the Coen's H.I. McDunnough has over Earl Hickey is (to me, at least) startling and rather touching. It's certainly the thing which put a broad smile on my face in the first thirty seconds of the film.

The yarn of dumb intentions and comedic ineptitude unravels with a greater focus than I've seen in Ethan and Joel's other movies; more immediately character driven and with a slyly-paced script. The second act feels like it devolves into farce slightly (although still a highly enjoyable farce), and everything was going well until the film's ending which is far neater and more saccharine than the screenplay should allow - even in a tall tale such as this. Ironically, My Name Is Earl pulls off these moments (and sappier ones, besides) because its TV format gives more time to build the personalities. An hour and a half is a perfectly respectable amount of time to spend in the McDunnough's company, but characters as fun as these are crying out for more.

But ultimately, Raising Arizona is a film which reminds me that as much as he's become a hoary old parody of himself, I do enjoy a Nicholas Cage movie (even if it's primarily for his presence alone). It's not a film which has redefined how I look at cinema, just one that I should have seen before tonight.

Thanks, Gareth ;)



Have you really never seen this before?
Yeah, as regular readers will attest, I didn't really do the Coen Bros until fairly recently. And I'm still not doing them particularly robustly.


So are you glad you've finally have?
I am.


And would you recommend it, now?
I would.


Oh, and is there a Wilhelm Scream in it?
There isn't.


…but what's the Star Wars connection?
Holly Hunter appeared in 1987's End Of The Line, as did Mr Wilford Brimley aka Noa in The Battle For Endor.


And if I HAD to put a number on it…




DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.