Showing posts with label Karen Allen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Karen Allen. Show all posts

Saturday, 8 July 2023

Review: Indiana Jones And The Dial Of Destiny (plot-spoilers)


Indiana Jones
And The Dial Of Destiny
(plot-spoilers)

Cert: 12A / 154 mins / Dir. James Mangold / Featurette

I have to admit that after watching Indiana Jones And The Dial Of Destiny three times, I love the film without it having made a huge jarring impact. Much like Solo, this seems to have slotted perfectly into the continuity with no real controversy (other than That Section In The Third Act which will have the usual suspects clutching at their nostalgic pearls, pining for the narrative realism of a magic box out of the Bible full of ghosts). Indy 5 slides deftly into the water rather than making a splash. And ultimately, this is for the best.

If you haven't seen the movie yet, there's a spoiler-free review here and a second one discussing themes here. Everything following the jump contains heavy plot-spoilers. Watch the film first. Hell, watch the film anyway...

SPOILERS AHEAD!


Still here? Lovely.

So while it fits seamlessly into the narrative and tonal continuity, the fifth entry in the series does feature a couple of glaring departures from its forebears. And the first of these is the very first thing the audience sees after the ads, trailers and a BBFC/MPAA card, with logos for Disney, Paramount and Lucasfilm. In that order. What this means is that there's no cross-fade from the Paramount mountain-ident into the film's opening scene. Which, frankly, people would expect...


Given that Disney are controlling production and distribution of the property now, it's unclear what part Paramount are playing in Indy 5. But you'd be forgiven for thinking that if the company is important enough to credit with full-screen branding, tradition alone would go so far as transforming the mountain into, perhaps, a pile of spent shell-casings in war-torn 1944?

It's not a huge deal, but this is a real shame and the only thing that's definitively missing (read: fixable) in the whole film.

Dial Of Destiny's other departure from the series is a little more complex...


NAILED


At the end of Raiders, the Ark Of The Covenant is closed and then nailed into a crate, to be kept safely out of harm's way (or at least until the US Government find a way to weaponise it, presumably). Similarly, Temple Of Doom sees the Sankara Stones returned to their people, and Last Crusade has the Holy Grail lost into the earth. Even Crystal Skull closes with the titular bonce being reunited with its owner and skipping off through the space between the spaces. Indy doesn't get to keep these McGuffins like Mr Benn sidling back to Festive Road with a memento. That's very much the point of the movies: archaeology is about acquiring and sharing knowledge rather than just hoarding treasure*1.

But as Dial Of Destiny winds down, a senior Henry Jones Jr wakes in his apartment to the ticking of a clock and a slow camera-pan (a callback to earlier in the film and a gorgeous nod to Back To The Future) with Archimedes' Antikythera sitting on the desk right next to him. Helena's left it there. It comes as no real surprise by this point that she's has decided against selling it off, but the dial is still in Indy's possession. Whether it can be used is up for discussion (and we're about to discuss it), but this is not an accident.


TUDORED


Shortly after, there's a lingering moment in the final scene where Indy and Marion reconnect in his kitchenette as the audience holds its breath for Mutt Williams strolling in through the door, to give a full family reunion. In this event, we would instinctively know that Helena had made an unseen, dial-assisted detour on their way back from the beach at Syracuse, managing to drop in on Mutt to have a quiet word about his upcoming enlistment in the US Army. The conversation between Indy and Helena in the second act where he laments his son's death certainly sets up this eventuality.

This doesn't happen, of course. Helena has already demonstrated (and with far greater clarity than her godfather) that she's got a firm grip on not changing the course of history. She's very eager to avoid inadvertently destroying the present they're trying to get back to*2, and so it appears she's brought everyone home without further chronological adjustment. Which is probably for the best.


SEABROOKED


This also results in a far more poignant ending, as Indy and Marion are rebuilding their relationship again (okay, again again) with wisdom, hope and reflection, rather than having their pain magicked away for a fluffy ending which must have been incredibly tempting in the writers' room.

Bur crucially - and for the first time, cinematically - Indy still has the item he's spent the last two and a half hours chasing. This movie may be marketed as the final cinematic outing for Jonsey, but we should be surprised if Disney had bought Lucasfilm to use this particular property only once. And as the final frames in the streets of New York show us, the man is incapable of hanging up his hat for good. Just what form future (or past) adventures will take is unclear, but Helena and the four screenwriters left the dial with Indy for a reason.


SPACE RAIDERED



Then again, crammed into the third-act catchup exposition is the idea that the Antikythera is 'a forced deck'. That it only ever calculated a portal to travel back to Syracuse in 213 BC and that was its sole purpose. Because if Archimedes' time-fissures are happening anyway and the dial is merely a signpost, why has nobody accidentally discovered one without it? Do these rifts always occur in the air and during a storm, so you'd need to be mad to fly into one? And it still doesn't explain why, by 1969, the world hasn't had visitors or explorers from the future. Or maybe it has? The dial isn't a time-machine per se, but it demonstrably makes time travel possible.

Basil Shaw's decryption notes only show us limited references to to/from dates, and even this is vague since he hadn't figured it all out. So do we assume that Archimedes managed to reverse-calculate 1969's entry-point, knowing that the journey must work because he'd seen the result of it in his own past? That fits with the time travel coil-theory and would make this a One And Done item. In which case - its power spent - the Dial Of Destiny itself fits neatly among its enchanted peers. Not quite so different, after all. Indy can finally get one of his artefacts safely into a museum.


Unless he holds on to it again, of course. Just to remind him...



And if I HAD to put a number on it…




*1 A point literally spelled out by John Hurt's Harold Oxley in the fourth instalment, much derided and yet encapsulating the series perfectly. That movie is underrated. I digress. [ BACK ]

*2 Let's not get into the fact that Dial Of Destiny does leave a Syracuse coastline whose archaeological remains apparently contain a two thousand year-old HE-111 bomber plane, along with the non-perishable badges, buttons and firearms of all the nazis who fell out of it. Although because of the film's fixed-approach to time travel, those items were always there anyway. So fair play I suppose. Still, it's odd that in 1969 nobody has found these. Then again, Antonio Banderas' diving crew finally manage to be the ones to stumble across a sunken galleon full of ancient gold that everyone in the local fishing community knew about which is in water so shallow it can conceivably be seen from the surface on a sunny day, so... [ BACK ]


DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

Thursday, 29 June 2023

Review: Indiana Jones And The Dial Of Destiny (spoiler-free)


Indiana Jones
And The Dial Of Destiny
(spoiler-free)

Cert: 12A / 154 mins / Dir. James Mangold / Trailer

Short and sweet then, you don't want to be reading all about Indiana Jones And The Dial Of Destiny at this point, you just want to know if it's worth the journey to the cinema. Your humble correspondent is delighted (albeit predictably so) to report that Indiana Jones And The Dial Of Destiny is worth the journey to the cinema.

We open - as is traditional - with a pre-main-movie adventure, set in the last days of the Second World War. Henry Jones (Harrison Ford) and fellow archaeologist Basil Shaw (Toby Jones) are on the trail of an historical artefact coveted by the nazis (no change there) when they inadvertently stumble over another, potentially far more powerful, one: Achimedes' Antikythera. And so, Indy makes another enemy-for-life in deranged scientist Jürgen Voller (Mads Mikkelsen). Fast forward to 1969, and Doctor Jones is about to retire from professorship in New York when his yearned-for release is interrupted by the arrival of his estranged goddaughter Helena (Phoebe Waller Bridge) and - not unconnectedly - Dr Jürgen Voller. Because you can't keep a good Macguffin down, and another adventure is about to begin...


GRAVITY


Director James Mangold has channeled the ochre colour-palette and emotional gravity of his spin with Logan for this fifth cinematic entry to the series. Considering how reluctant so many of the characters are to get actively involved in life-threatening high jinks, the whole thing zips along (mostly) at an exhilarating pace. The story is linear enough to get by without being overwhelmed by exposition, but also facilitates the introduction of new characters as well as a handful of old favourites. Bathed in a Kodak-glow, cinematographer Phedon Papamichael channels warm vintage tones long before we're whisked off to the Mediterranean, while the three-strong editing team balance the relentless chase sequences with conveying the weight on Indy's shoulders. Meanwhile, John Williams is on outstanding form with a score which fits seamlessly into the canon and channels some of his best work from the Star Wars prequel-era.

It's not all plain-sailing, of course. The film is longer than it needs to be (because we're never more than five minutes away from one of those chase-sequences), there's a definite sag in the second-act, and the mechanics of the crucial central premise itself feel under-explained; not in a mysterious way, more that the writers couldn't agree on how it was actually going to work and so It Just Does. The recovery of each prized antiquity leans toward a straightforward checklist, and the antagonists are always a conveniently-assured two paces behind, despite rarely showing their working-out. All of the cast here are competent and great fun to watch, but swathes of them carry a very 21st century sensibility which feels out of place for 1969. And the worst offender here, unfortunately, is Phoebe Waller-Bridge (who is otherwise excellent as usual). Oh, and that CGI on the wartime-Indy is still far from perfect. It's way better than the Rogue One debacle, but once again the images that look amazing as stills fall down when they're moving, and our hero's face always feels like it's lit separately and from a different angle. The overall effect is of a video-game cutscene; something which really looks like Harrison Ford but is definitely not him on a subconscious level.


INTERSTELLAR


The best trick the movie pulls, though, is that ultimately none of that matters. The love and attention to detail which have gone into this more than make up for its shortcomings in a year where mediocrity seems encouraged. And extra points should be awarded for a bittersweet ending which doesn't take the glaringly obvious feel-good route many other films would have (more on that in the upcoming spoiler-review).


Indiana Jones And The Dial Of Destiny never quite matches the rip-roaring highs of the first three movies (and frankly, no one expected that to be the case), but the energy, enthusiasm and sincerity are more than enough for long-haul Indy fans to love.

Go. Go to the cinema.
Now.



And if I HAD to put a number on it…





DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.

Thursday, 5 November 2015

Review: Animal House

I can't believe I haven't seen…

Animal House Poster

Animal House (1978)
Cert: 15 / 108 mins / Dir. John Landis / Trailer
WoB Rating: 3/7


…and here on the right you can see National Lampoon's Animal House, which is what people used to laugh at in the old days before comedy movies were invented*1. Over-acted, under-written and directed with the surgical precision of an elephant falling down a lift-shaft, this is the quintessential film to watch while you're drunk, as a teenager, in 1978. Any missing parts of that combination will result in disappointment, the scale of which is directly commensurate with the absent factors.

This is by no means an 'awful' film (even though it has plenty of awful things about it), but it really hasn't aged well. At all. Both the scripted and visual gags are broad to the point of completely vague, with long lingering pauses acting as a substitute for punchlines, and I can't quite work out if the overall clunkiness is down to a) the film being a 1978 frat-com when I'm used to the more boisterous, dynamic ones from the 90s and 00s, b) this being a National Lampoon's movie ie SNL writ-large, or c) the film being directed by John 'Burke and Hare' Landis. As above, I think all three play a contributing factor.

The film's not completely without merit, of course, but the few moments where it succeeds are through a certain naive charm rather than any comedic muscle. But the fact that I didn't laugh doesn't change its undeniable influence over the comedy genre for the last four decades.

The thought occurred to me that Animal House could work much better for 2015 if it was remade. This was immediately followed by the thought that in the intervening years, it essentially has been remade, countless times; sometimes better, but often far, far worse. This is one of those films whose lasting appeal is little more than a warm, glowing nostalgia rather than the work itself. A nostalgia you just don't have if you wait 37 years before you watch it.

Animal House feels like a drunk painstakingly setting up a joke then repeatedly forgetting the punchline. Actually no, it pretty much is that…


And in the upstairs-pillow-fight scene, how are silhouettes of the girls being cast at the window if the curtains are open when Blutarsky climbs the ladder? Write your fucking film, you morons. Although the fact that no-one spots a fully illuminated face less than a foot away from the window suggests that perhaps the screenplay isn't supposed to be taken literally…


Have you really never seen this before?
Somehow, never.


So are you glad you've finally have?
Well, it's on the list of 'film arguments to have in the pub' now…


And would you recommend it, now?
Only if you're drunk.
And a teenager.
In 1978.



Oh, and is there a Wilhelm Scream in it?
Oh, that there was…


…but what's the Star Wars connection?
Animal House stars Karen Allen, who played Marion Ravenwood in those Indy films opposite Harrison 'Solo' Ford.


And if I HAD to put a number on it…




*1 1979's The Life Of Brian was the first recorded Comedy Film™, of course, and many more were created over the next five years and artificially aged and copyrighted to much earlier dates in an attempt to mask Hollywood's embarrassment.
It's a lie which was sold so successfully that it's now largely accepted as truth, albeit erroneously.

DISCLAIMERS:
• ^^^ That's dry, British humour, and most likely sarcasm or facetiousness.
• Yen's blog contains harsh language and even harsher notions of propriety. Reader discretion is advised.
• This is a personal blog. The views and opinions expressed here represent my own thoughts (at the time of writing) and not those of the people, institutions or organisations that I may or may not be related with unless stated explicitly.